Sybqa

Comparison · SmartBear Reflect

Reflect alternative: Sybqa vs SmartBear Reflect

Reflect is now part of SmartBear: the old reflect.run address redirects to smartbear.com/product/reflect. It is a test automation product in which you write steps in plain English, or create tests from an AI coding tool, and Reflect runs them against web, mobile, API and visual checks. Sybqa does not ask you to author tests. You paste a link, review a plan and read an evidence report. We make Sybqa. If you want maintained tests across web, mobile and API, Reflect is built for that; if you want to know what is broken on a site today, Sybqa is the simpler start.

Facts checked

At a glance

Sybqa and SmartBear Reflect compared on the points both publish
PointSybqaSmartBear Reflect
Core jobChecks a site you point it at and reports evidence of what brokeAI-powered test automation for web and mobile apps: tests you write as steps and keep
Where you startA link and an optional goal. You review the plan before anything runsPlain-English steps that its AI turns into automated actions, or tests created from AI coding environments such as Claude Code or Cursor
Kinds of testBrowser journeys, responsive layout, accessibility rules and page errors. No native mobile app testingWeb end-to-end, mobile on native real devices rather than emulators, API requests and responses, and visual testing
Keeping tests workingA saved plan re-runs as reviewed; there is no test suite to maintainSays it adapts to changes in the app instead of relying on selectors; this is a vendor claim we have not tested
PipelinesThe GitHub Action and API tokens start a saved plan from a pipeline (guide)Lists Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins and Travis CI among its integrations
BrowsersA real browser at desktop (1440 px), phone (390 px) and narrow (320 px) widths, with axe-core accessibility checksChrome, Firefox, Edge and Safari are listed on its pricing page
How usage is countedDeterministic checks use no AI credits; AI checks draw down the plan’s creditsCredits per month: a web test uses 1 credit, a mobile test 5 and an API test 0.1
Public pricingA free plan after sign-up (10 runs a month, no AI review) and a paid plan with AI creditsPremium (5,000 credits a month), Advanced (20,000) and Enterprise (40,000), each with unlimited users and a 14-day free trial. The page lists no dollar prices; mobile parallel testing is an add-on

What Reflect does better

Which one to choose

Choose Reflect if

  • You want maintained end-to-end tests that cover web, mobile on real devices and APIs.
  • Your team will write test steps in plain English or generate them from an AI coding tool.
  • You already use SmartBear tools or need their integrations.

Choose Sybqa if

  • You have no suite and want an independent first check of a site before you share it.
  • You want a report with screenshots and steps to reproduce rather than tests to maintain.
  • You want a free start with prices you can read without a sales conversation.

What this comparison does not claim

Common questions

Is Reflect part of SmartBear?

Its product page is hosted on SmartBear’s site and calls it SmartBear Reflect, and the old reflect.run address redirects there. We did not read a statement about how that came about, so this page does not describe its history.

Does Reflect publish its prices?

The pricing page we read lists three plans by monthly credit allowance and a 14-day free trial, with contact-sales and demo buttons, but no dollar amounts. Sybqa’s free plan gives 10 runs a month without AI review after sign-up.

Sources

Try Sybqa on your site

Paste a link, review the plan, and read the evidence report. The free plan gives 10 runs a month without AI review after you sign up. See pricing.

Test my site Create a free account