Choose smolanalytics if you want one-sentence tests on every pull request, replayed recordings with no model call, and tracking instrumentation kept correct beside PostHog, GA4 or similar. Choose Sybqa if you want a reviewed plan and a published-site evidence report without writing sentences or running on your own CI runner. We have not run smolanalytics.
On this pageContext and limits
smolanalytics turns an English sentence into an end-to-end browser check, records a passing run so later replays need no model call, and comments on pull requests from your own Actions runner. It also maintains analytics tracking calls in SDKs you already use. Sybqa starts from a link and a plan you review and returns an evidence report; it does not install into your CI as a sentence suite. We make Sybqa, so weigh this page accordingly.
Sybqa and smolanalytics compared on the points both publishScroll sideways for more columns.
Point
Sybqa
smolanalytics
Core job
SybqaExplores approved journeys for bugs, UI inconsistencies and UX flow issues using manual-testing techniques and real browser checks
smolanalyticsEnd-to-end tests from one English sentence; optional analytics tracking maintenance
Where you start
SybqaA link and an optional goal. You review the plan before anything runs
smolanalyticsnpx smolanalytics test --url … --test "…", a markdown suite, or MCP in the editor
What you get back
SybqaAn evidence report (HTML, JSON and JUnit) with available screenshots and recorded steps; blocked and not-run checks are listed, never counted as passed
smolanalyticsVerdicts: passed, failed, flaky, stale or errored; PR comments; recordings that replay without a model
Public pricing
SybqaA free plan after signup (10 runs a month, no AI review) and a paid plan with AI credits
smolanalyticsOne plan: $19/mo for 100 tested pull requests, then 10¢ each; 14-day trial, no card. Repo audit free with no account
How usage is counted
SybqaRuns without AI review use no credits; AI review uses the plan’s credits
smolanalyticsTest runs use your CI runner and your Anthropic key (not metered by smolanalytics); the product meters tested pull requests
Pipelines
SybqaStart a saved plan from GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, CircleCI or any CI with an API token (guide)
smolanalyticsRuns on your GitHub Actions runner with GITHUB_TOKEN comments; no GitHub App required
Which one to choose
Choose smolanalytics if
You merge often and want a sentence suite commenting on every pull request.
You already pay for an Anthropic key and are fine running browsers on your own CI.
You also want help keeping analytics track() calls correct in your repo.
Choose Sybqa if
You want a hosted browser check without bringing your own model key or CI minutes.
You want a reviewed plan and a report for a published URL before you share it.
You are not trying to replace or babysit an analytics SDK.
smolanalytics’ pricing page says it does not replace Plausible, PostHog, GA4 or Mixpanel and has no video session replay. Sybqa likewise is not an analytics product.
What this comparison does not claim
We make Sybqa. We read smolanalytics’ public home, docs and pricing pages on the date shown under Sources. We have not run smolanalytics. Confirm pricing and verdict behaviour there before you buy.
Common questions
Do I need an account to try smolanalytics?
Its home page shows npx smolanalytics test against a URL with no account. The Pro plan meters tested pull requests; the repo audit is free forever with no account.
Who pays for the model calls?
smolanalytics’ pricing page says test runs execute on your CI runner and your Anthropic key; the product meters tested pull requests, not individual model calls.
Explore bugs, UI consistency and user journeys from a reviewed plan. Inspect browser evidence and visual review leads in the report. The free plan gives 10 runs a month without AI review after you sign up. See pricing.
Add your site link here and it will be waiting in the console after you create an account. Then describe one journey to check and review the test plan before any run starts.